Mostrando postagens com marcador Measurement Errors. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Measurement Errors. Mostrar todas as postagens

sexta-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2026

Adjustment of Observations in Geodesy: Types of Errors in Geodetic Observations.

This free course on Adjustment of Observations and Least Squares is designed for students and professionals in Geodesy, Surveying, and Geomatics. Each lesson includes theoretical explanations, solved examples, and practical exercises.


Lesson 02 – Types of Errors in Geodetic Observations



Objectives

  1. Understand the different types of errors present in geodetic measurements.
  2. Distinguish between systematic, random, and gross errors.
  3. Identify the origin and behavior of each type of error.
  4. Recognize the importance of error classification in the adjustment process.


1. Introduction

Every geodetic observation contains errors. Since the true value of a measured quantity is unknown, it is essential to understand the nature of these errors in order to control, model, or minimize their effects.

Errors in geodetic measurements are generally classified into three main categories:

  • Systematic errors.
  • Random errors.
  • Gross errors.

This classification is fundamental for the proper application of the Least Squares Method.


2. Systematic Errors

Systematic errors follow a predictable pattern and affect measurements in a consistent way.


2.1 Characteristics

  • Same sign and similar magnitude under the same conditions.
  • Caused by identifiable physical or instrumental factors.
  • Can be modeled and corrected.

2.2 Examples

  • Instrument calibration errors.
  • Temperature effects on distance measurements.
  • Atmospheric refraction.
  • Scale factor errors.
  • Incorrect prism constant.

2.3 Treatment

Systematic errors should be:

  • eliminated through calibration, or
  • modeled mathematically in the functional model.

If not treated, they affect the accuracy of the results.


3. Random Errors

Random errors are small variations caused by unpredictable factors.


3.1 Characteristics

  • Irregular in magnitude and sign.
  • Follow a normal (Gaussian) distribution.
  • Mean value approximately equal to zero.
  • Cannot be eliminated individually.

3.2 Sources

  • Instrument noise.
  • Environmental variations.
  • Operator limitations.
  • Small atmospheric fluctuations.

3.3 Treatment

Random errors are reduced by:

  • Repeated observations.
  • Redundancy.
  • Least Squares Adjustment.

They affect the precision of the measurements.


4. Gross Errors

Gross errors are large mistakes caused by human or operational failures.


4.1 Examples

  • Reading the wrong value.
  • Data entry mistakes.
  • Instrument misleveling.
  • Loss of GNSS signal.
  • Measuring the wrong point.

4.2 Characteristics

  • Much larger than random errors
  • Do not follow statistical behavior
  • Cannot be corrected mathematically

4.3 Treatment

Gross errors must be:

  • detected, and
  • removed before or during adjustment.

They are usually identified through:

  • residual analysis
  • statistical tests
  • consistency checks.

5. Importance for Adjustment of Observations

The Least Squares Method assumes that:

  • systematic errors have been removed or modeled
  • gross errors are absent
  • remaining errors are random and normally distributed

If gross or systematic errors remain, the adjustment results may be unreliable.


6. Solved Example

A distance was measured five times (m): 152.334; 152.331; 152.336; 152.333; 152.335.

The values show small variations around the mean and no extreme values.


6.1 Interpretation:

  • Errors are small and irregular.
  • Behavior is consistent with random errors.
  • Data are suitable for adjustment.

7. Proposed Example

Angle observations (seconds): 30.124; 30.118; 30.121; 30.950


7.1 Interpretation:

The value 30.950 is significantly different from the others and should be considered a gross error and investigated before adjustment.


8. Conclusion

Geodetic observations are affected by systematic, random, and gross errors. Correct identification and treatment of these errors are essential to ensure reliable and accurate results in the adjustment process.

Next Class
All Lessons
Compartilhar:

quarta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2026

Adjustment of Observations in Geodesy: Concept of Observation, Error and Uncertainty

Lesson 01 – Concept of Observation, Error and Uncertainty


This lesson introduces the fundamental concepts required to understand the adjustment of observations in Geodesy. Every measurement performed in the field contains errors and uncertainties. Understanding their nature is essential before applying the Least Squares Method.


1. What is an Observation?

In Geodesy, an observation is the numerical result of a physical measurement obtained using an instrument such as a GNSS receiver, total station, or level. Observations may represent distances, angles, height differences, or coordinates.

Mathematically, an observation can be expressed as:

L = Ltrue + e

where L is the observed value, Ltrue is the true value (unknown), and e is the observation error.


2. Types of Errors

2.1 Systematic Errors

Systematic errors follow a predictable pattern and usually have identifiable causes. Examples include instrument calibration errors, atmospheric effects, or incorrect scale factors. These errors affect accuracy and must be modeled or corrected.

2.2 Random Errors

Random errors are unpredictable variations caused by environmental conditions, instrument noise, or observational limitations. They follow a normal distribution and have zero mean. The Least Squares Method is designed to minimize their effect.

2.3 Gross Errors

Gross errors are large mistakes caused by human or operational failures, such as incorrect readings, data entry errors, or loss of signal. These errors must be detected and removed before adjustment.


3. Precision, Accuracy and Uncertainty

Precision describes the repeatability of measurements and is related to the dispersion of the observed values. Accuracy refers to the closeness of the observations to the true value. Uncertainty quantifies the level of confidence associated with a measurement result.

It is possible to have high precision and low accuracy when systematic errors are present.


4. Importance in Geodetic Adjustment

Because the true value is unknown, the goal of adjustment is to determine the most probable value of the measured quantity. This is achieved by combining redundant observations and minimizing the effect of random errors.


5. Solved Example

A distance between two geodetic points was measured four times, producing the following values in meters:

158,327    158,321    158,332    158,326

Step 1 – Mean value:

L = 158,3265 m

Step 2 – Standard deviation:

σ ≈ 0,0043 m

Step 3 – Standard error of the mean:

m = σ / √n = 0,0021 m

Final result:

L = 158,3265 ± 0,0021 m


6. Proposed Exercise

The following distance measurements in meters were obtained:

158,406    158,403    158,410    158,405    158,402

Calculate:

a) The mean value
b) The standard deviation
c) The standard error of the mean

Expected final result:

L = 158,4052 ± 0,0030 m

7. Conclusion

All geodetic observations contain errors. Understanding the nature of systematic, random, and gross errors is essential for reliable data processing. Redundant measurements allow the estimation of the most probable value and its associated uncertainty, forming the foundation of the Least Squares Adjustment.

Next Class
All Lessons
Compartilhar:

SOCIAL





InstagramFacebookTwitterLattesOrcid

ANÚNCIO

Arquivo do Blog

Seguidores

Recomendado

Postagens populares

Tecnologia do Blogger.